Gap Between IGA and IAM

While IGA and IAM can benefit organizations, they are different. While IGA manages all users and their entitlements to applications, IAM focuses on privileged users. Both solutions help organizations maintain a consistent, centralized user identity lifecycle. But each has its advantages and disadvantages.

IGA Can Control Moves And Removal of Employees

IGA offers a wide range of customizable access management system open source solutions to meet your organization’s unique needs. These options include segregation of duties controls and RBAC models to prevent unapproved access to sensitive data. You can streamline your access review process by customizing your solution to your company’s needs.

As organizations move towards the cloud, IGA solutions are increasingly being requested to integrate with other enterprise applications. They are also looking for solutions that can help manage identities across various platforms. Furthermore, companies are looking for self-service capabilities that empower employees to manage their identities, which speeds up the onboarding process for new employees and makes it easier for them to get up to speed.

IGA is essential software for companies seeking to comply with regulatory requirements and audits. IGA also helps ensure compliance with security policies and protect business-critical systems. It improves visibility into provisioning entitlements and enables admins to revoke access. IGA facilitates compliance reporting by providing a complete view of IT environment activity. It makes it simple to generate reports based on the criteria that matter most to your organization.

IGA Can Streamline User Identity Lifecycle Management

A centralized identity management platform, such as an IGA solution, can simplify the management of user identity and access across enterprise applications. It also offers powerful data logging, analysis, and reporting capabilities that help organizations meet compliance and make critical decisions. These systems also allow IT administrators, to view a high-level view of their IT environments and quickly troubleshoot problems. This report describes the advantages and disadvantages of different IGA solutions and offers an in-depth comparison of the various products available.

Identity governance and administration (IGA) tools automate labor-intensive tasks, saving time for IT administrators. This allows them to focus on more critical issues. These tools usually come with an intuitive user interface that will enable users to handle service requests independently and quickly. They also feature dashboards with metrics and analytical data. In addition, they can help organizations reduce the risks associated with user identity management.

IGA systems are best used with IAM tools to achieve centralized identity management. This approach helps organizations manage user identities in one environment and improve scalability. For instance, SAP offers IGA solutions along with centralized IAM policies. Some of the leading companies that use these tools include 3M, Mondelez International, and Stanley Black & Decker.

IGA Can Be Expensive

While a company can deploy a third-party identity assurance application above its existing infrastructure, it can only control costs if the IGA is successful. While the third-party application can execute basic UARs across all scoped applications, the company must ensure the IGA will perform well before committing to the investment. For example, it must justify the cost of implementing a new Access Review portal and workflow and the need to retrain or hire specialized administrators.

Implementing an IGA system requires complex integrations with legacy systems and other business applications. These integrations are expensive to develop and maintain and require significant support and maintenance. Additionally, replacing an IGA system can entail re-evaluating and re-engineering business processes. Luckily, this is possible.